• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Keswick Life

Lifestyles in Keswick and its environs

  • Current Issue
  • Back Issues
  • About Us
  • Columnists
  • Keswick Scene
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Featured Articles

Travel Journal

TRAVEL: Farewell to the A-Bar

September 28, 2017 By Keswick Life

Share on Facebook
Facebook
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter
Email this to someone
email

By Charles Thacher

Editor’s Note: Warning! This story is a bit strange, as it begins as non-fiction and ends as fantasy, with a weird mid-70s TV pop-culture connection which the writer hopes the older folks will get, but the young’ns might say “whoa, this guy’s doin’ some bad stuff”.  I hope you enjoy this as much as I did, and be sure to write in and tell it to Keswick Life and Charlie on what you think. – Colin D.

For this angler, no town is more misnamed than Last Chance, Idaho, the headquarters for fishing the famed Ranch Section of the Henrys Fork River. It should be named No Chance. When there, I rise confidently by 7AM – a most uncivilized hour for fly fishers – so that I can walk the two miles or so to the Islands, a lovely section of the famed spring creek, and arrive before other anglers and the wind, with the hopes of seeing a few noses poke through the glassy surface. Often there are noses, but they are attached to most diminutive bodies. Occasionally, across conflicting currents and in difficult lies near the banks, the noses and their appended bodies are substantial. But these noses are different, as they usually seem to be positioned over mouths that aren’t designed to open, at least for my offerings. And, the better rises seem always to be just out of my casting range and, magically, as I try stealthily to move toward them they move away at the same speed. I flail the water, spending much of my time changing flies, until invariably the wind comes up about eleven o’clock, creating a riffle, putting down the noses and driving me off the river to the supreme boredom of Last Chance, until the evening hatch starts. It’s the kind of experience that makes non-believers wonder why anyone bothers with this activity.

Ah, but there are consolations. The evening hatch, though typically yielding only an hour or two of fishing before dark, usually brings up more large fish, and I have frequently succeeded in hooking a few. And there was the après-fishing. So, I was saddened to read last year that the A-Bar had finally closed for good.

The A-Bar was a prototypical Western saloon. The only one in Last Chance and for another forty miles or more. It had the essential ingredients – a horseshoe shaped bar with a glass top covering hundreds of silver dollars, a coin deposit pool table accompanied by a few cues, one or two of which rolled straight on the table and still had their tips attached, a juke box filled with edgy pop stars like Merle Haggard and Little Jimmy Dickens, a television that got one channel poorly, dinette tables scattered about with plastic covered chairs embedded with last week’s salsa, and a clientele of local ranch hands, fishermen and their guides, bikers and their bimboesque babes slow dancing, and a few tourists who were lost on their way to Yellowstone Park. The food, red meat or Tex-Mex, mountain oysters or lamb fries, was better than decent, and my only complaint was the lack of draft beer and, in fact any beer that had the slightest hint of flavor or body, until Sam Adams appeared in bottles a few years ago. The A-Bar was welcoming to everyone –its vice and its virtue.

I also have a sentimental attachment to the A-Bar. Some of my favorite fishing experiences and fantasies began there. One night in the mid-90s I was sitting at the bar, quaffing a beer and pondering what was deficient in my personality or judgment, that I would commit so much time and effort to such an utterly hopeless activity, when I overheard the guy on the next stool say to the bartender “Tomorrow I’m cutting out of here for the Missouri. I just talked to my buddy who is up there, and he told me that the river is lower than it has been in years, you can walk the banks and wade everyplace, and the dry fly fishing is awesome.” I knew nothing about fishing the Missouri, but it sure sounded better than what I had going. So, I got some details from the guy and the next morning, instead of walking down river, I drove north to Wolf Creek, about four hours away. I had some great fishing and the Mo became one of my favorite rivers. I have returned nearly every year since.

Another night, I was sitting next to a young man and we got to talking about places that we had fished. He said that for the past two winters he had guided at a lodge in southern Chile called El Saltamontes. I asked him how it was and he replied “You know what ‘saltamontes’ means, right?”

“Yeah. Sure. It’s an Italian dish with veal wrapped in prosciutto and sage, cooked in marsala, over a bed of spinach. I prefer the version with a few slices of a hard-boiled egg on top, but what the hell does that have to do with fishing?”

He rolled his head back and his eyebrows went up to his hat. “You’re joking, no? Saltemontes means ‘grasshopper’ in Spanish. The Lodge is on the Ñirehuao River. It’s the greatest hopper fishing in the world. They swarm like bees, and the big brown trout cruise the banks waiting for them to get blown into the water. In fact, several times I’ve seen large fish jump on to the banks and flop around to knock the hoppers into the water, then they flip back into the river and eat them. You’ll often see slimy spots in the grass on the bank, where the fish have landed.”

Although I found the last part of his tale a bit tall, I was
in a vulnerable frame of mind, since I was trying to fish a river where at least a half-dozen tiny bugs were always hatching simultaneously and after a day of total futility I had to face the guy in the fly shop who would tell me that the only thing working was some obscure fly that, of course, was completely sold out. Hearing of a river where you could prowl the banks all day with a big bushy fly, and with fish so aggressive that you had to hide behind a bush to tie it on your line, sounded like heaven.

The next February I was off to southern Chile. After traveling for well over 20 hours my guide picked me up at the Balmaceda airport. “I assume that you didn’t get our email?”.

“No. I haven’t looked at my email in four or five days. Why?”

“Well, we’ve had a bunch of rain and the river is running a bit high. We emailed all of our guests three days ago telling them not to come. When we arrived at the lodge after driving for an hour and a half, I saw what he meant. The river, which was normally about the size of the Rivanna, was now as broad as the James, and it was an ugly chocolate brown color. “Is there any point in fishing this?”

“No, it’s a hundred-year flood. Highest that we’ve ever seen it. It won’t be fishable for at least two weeks.” If my life were measured by the number of “hundred-year floods” that I’ve encountered at lodges, I’d be older than Methusalah.

“So, what’s the program?”

“No program. You might as well leave tomorrow.” The next day I caught a flight about 500 miles north, where I discovered some excellent fishing in Chile’s beautiful Lake Country, which I have revisited three times with great pleasure. To the Lodge’s credit they gave me a free week of fishing the following year, which I thoroughly enjoyed despite more rain, though I never did see a big brown trout swatting hoppers off the bank.

But there was another night in the A-Bar that is my most memorable. I met an old angler named Whitey Whitmore who, in the past ten years had become a legend on the Ranch, fishing it exclusively and every day during the season. Supposedly, he could catch ‘em when and where no one else could. He had a grungy grayish white beard – was a spitting image of Foster Brooks – and, as it turned out, shared many oratorical flourishes with that great rhetorician. We chatted over a beer then hooked up as partners on the pool table. Our first match ended when Whitey sank the 8-ball on the break. It caused a bit of a fuss, because he broke the rack so hard that two other balls left the table. Our opponents protested, and we agreed to let the bartender rule. His sage decision was that “If someone is good enough to sink the 8-ball on the break, he shouldn’t be accountable for collateral damage.” In our next match, Whitey sank the 8-ball on the shot after his break, so we got bounced and repaired to the bar, even though I had not yet taken a shot. He switched to his regular drink, Jägermeister and Squirt, and began regaling me with stories of angling adventures in his life before he had settled in to fish the Ranch into eternity. Seems that after hearing any far-fetched or wild rumor, he would head off to the most remote corners of the world in search of exotic fish that could perhaps be caught on a fly. His final tale, though a bit garbled by booze, has remained with me and I have often lamented the fact that I have not followed its trail. I’ll pass it on as I heard it.

While fishing for eels on a river in Moldova, Whitey had met Aristotelis, a Greek angler who said he had recently returned from his best trip ever, fishing for giant prelapsarian taimen, a trout-like fish, in the remote mountainous northeastern corner of the former Soviet republic of Kojakistan. These fish live only in the Stavros river system where they have survived for thousands of years. Normally the big taimen feed only on smaller fish and aquatic newts deep in the river’s largest pools. But in late May, seed pods drop from the beech trees that line the river, some ferment on the ground, and lemmings feed on them. After eating the fermented pods, the lemmings become disoriented, and many fall off the bank into the water. The sight and sounds of the inebriated lemmings thrashing about and belching loudly catches the attention of the taimen, and they come to the surface to eat them. In fact, for a period of several weeks, their diet consists almost exclusively of besotted lemmings, and that is when they can be caught by twitching big bushy flies on the surface. Aristotelis said that the taimen were the strongest fish he had ever encountered, and that in five days he had hooked about twenty, but had landed only three, the largest being over 70 pounds. Some that he lost were much larger, exceeding 100 pounds. He claimed that his problem was that he had only moderately heavy rods that he used for salmon, which were too light. In the five days, he had broken all three of his rods and lost two fly lines to the giants.

Aristotelis’ tale caught Whitey. When he returned to the U.S., he first attempted to find someone in Kojakistan that he could contact regarding the fishing possibilities, but failed. The internet had just reached there and the national website merely said “Under construction. Please return if we finish”. He visited Kojakistan’s consulate in Washington, but the entire staff consisted of Americans of Kojaki descent from Toledo who had never actually been to the country, and knew little about it except that their grandmothers had always prepared the national dish, pickled rutabaga in fermented yak milk, for special holidays. But, being an undaunted angler, the following May, Whitey tied up some lemming flies, packed his heaviest rods and caught a Flying Yak Airlines flight from Baku to Savalas, an ancient Greek city that was founded by Alexander the Great’s food taster who deserted from the army in 327 B.C. on the way to India after eating a bad date, and which is the modern capital of Kojakistan. He checked into the Telli Hotel, the only one in Savalas with indoor plumbing and turn down service, and began to ask around for information on the Stavros River. He finally tracked down Abbimann, a local yurt-maker who spoke a bit of English because his brother was a third-degree shaman at the Kumbaya Yurt Colony in Boulder, Colorado. He offered to take Whitey to the Stavros for 500 Kopeckiz, the equivalent of $6.37. The next day they left for the river in Abbimann’s beaten up UAZ Patriot, a Russian SUV known for its massive cup holders which can hold four two-liter bottles of vodka, and usually do.

Although the Stavros was less than 100 kilometers away it took five days to get there, traveling on terrible dirt tracks. They passed only one other vehicle, a rusted out 1958 Edsel, and a few nomadic tribesmen riding yaks. When they arrived at the river in the early evening, Whitey was surprised, first at its size and then at its beauty. It was well over 200 yards wide, very clear, with huge deep pools separated by long glides. While Abbimann was setting up their yurt by a beech grove, Whitey began exploring for signs of lemmings. There were a few seed pods on the ground but no evidence that any were being eaten, or of lemmings. When he walked down to the river he noticed some tiny flies in the air and small dimples on the water. He caught one of the flies, which looked surprisingly similar to a fly that he occasionally found on the Henrys Fork. He then started examining the water. My god! The dimples were from trout, not taimen– and they were enormous. Every fish he saw was at least five pounds, some were over ten, and all were gulping the tiny flies. He couldn’t believe it. Aristotelis never mentioned the trout. He had bought only four very heavy rods and lines, huge flies, and materials to tie more of the same, and he was camped in dry fly nirvana!

But Whitey had come to catch the giants, so he remained calm, suspecting that lemmings probably ate the pods during the night and then, in their stupors, fell into the river in the early morning. He turned in early to listen for the familiar soft crunching noise made by a munching lemming, followed shortly thereafter by the high-pitched squeal of ecstasy that comes with intoxication. It never happened. When he arose in the morning, he heard only one sound – slurping fish. By 9 A.M. the air was already full of small mayflies and the huge trout were gorging on them. Whitey was helpless with his heavy rods and lines, and no small flies. But he couldn’t give up. He strung up his lightest rod, put on his smallest lemming imitation, and started casting. All he succeeded in doing was scaring the trout.

Although Abbimann didn’t fully understand Whitey’s problem, he had the solution. “We can get the big fish up with explosives. I’m sure we can buy some in the village downriver. The natives here make it from yak dung.”

“Really, yaks produce good fertilizer for making bombs?”

“Most powerful stuff you can get. If you’d ever walked behind a yak all day, you’d understand”.

Whitey didn’t even try to explain the problems with using bombs, but sent Abbimann to the village to get information on the lemming/taimen situation. When he returned that evening the news was not good. The lemmings run in cycles – three years of proliferation and three years of disappearance. Last year was the end of a cycle of proliferation. This year there are very few lemmings and the taimen are sulking at the bottom of the deepest pools. Nothing will bring them up but explosives.

That evening Whitey watched the largest brown trout that he had ever seen – he estimated it at over 15 pounds – sucking in the small flies. He spent the next day casting lemming and chipmunk imitations through the pools without ever moving a fish, while all around him monster trout were feeding voraciously on small flies. Never had fishing made him so depressed. Why hadn’t he packed just one light weight rod and line and a few small flies? Why did he let his planning for this trip be dictated by one goofy Greek. He cursed Aristotelis a hundred times – another Greek gift gone awry.

A second day of futility and Whitey was finished. Seeing rising trout everywhere and having no way to fish for them was too much to endure. The next morning Abbimann packed up camp and they left for the long drive to Savalas. Eight days later he arrived back in the U.S. Although he planned to return to Kojakistan with more versatile equipment, the brutal coup six months later led by the President’s mother-in-law, and the installation of the repressive and paranoiac dictatorship under her bastard son, the enigmatic Danfra Zer, who immediately banned sport fishing and sky diving, quashed those plans. Shortly after, Whitey gave up his Gadabout Gaddis life, and retired to Last Chance to spend his remaining years chasing trout that were rarely as large as the smallest he had seen in Kojakistan, hanging out at the A-Bar and spinning his yarns.

By the time Whitey finished his story he was sloshing his words, making Foster Brooks look like temperance. I wanted to be sympathetic. “God, what a depressing story! You had a shot at maybe the greatest dry fly fishing in the world, and came up empty. How’d you get over it?”

“I dint. Neber haf.” At that moment, a stout bald man with a tootsie pop hanging from his mouth and wearing a tee shirt with the message “Who loves ya baby?” approached Whitey and threw his arm around him. He looked at me. “Whitey feeding you full of his ridiculous fishing stories?”

Whitey looked dazed but responded. “Deh’r all true. I’d neber lie about fishin.” At that moment he eructed, slipped off the stool and went to the floor. I jumped down to check on his condition but the bald guy had already hoisted him over his shoulder and was heading toward the door. Whitey protested. “I gotta finish my story. Why you taking me out? You sonabitch Greek.” But the bald guy and Whitey were out the door.

So, I was left to contemplate Kojakistan, and its monster taimen and trout. I don’t know if Whitey outlived the A-Bar, but I miss them both.

Share on Facebook
Facebook
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter
Email this to someone
email

Filed Under: Travel Journal

TRAVEL: Fishing In Wine Country

August 7, 2017 By Keswick Life

Share on Facebook
Facebook
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter
Email this to someone
email

By Charles Thacher

The pursuit of fish with a fly has taken me to many far-flung locations. Frequently, even if the quality of the fishing has been disappointing, the overall experience has been enjoyable. So, rarely do I evaluate an invitation to fish based solely on my angling expectations.

This past January an email arrived from the Fario Club, the fly-fishing club of Paris, inviting members to explore the trout fishing in the streams of Burgundy, the famous wine region of France.  The Club was originally identified with Charles Ritz, whose father, Cesar Ritz, started the Ritz-Carlton hotel chain in 1898. Cesar was known among his peers as the “king of hoteliers and hotelier to kings” and, of course, the hotels continue to carry that cachet today. Charles took over management of the hotels following World War I and continued in that role until his death in 1976.

Charles Ritz began fly fishing in his 20s, while residing in the United States. He took to it quickly, and became one of the most skilled casters and anglers in the world. His 1959 angling autobiography, A Fly Fisher’s Life – which has been translated into many languages – is generally considered one of the finest books ever written on the sport. In 1958, he founded the Fario Club (named for the brown trout), which attracted as members many prominent men, because of Ritz’s celebrity as an angler, hotelier and bon vivant. Ritz was the life-blood of the Club, and shortly after he died in 1976, the Club died with him. Fortunately, about two decades ago, it was resuscitated by a new group of French anglers led by the engaging and energetic Laurent Sainsot.

The email from Laurent described a trip that would include fishing the Seine River and a few of its tributaries. That’s right – the Seine, which I knew only from seeing it in Paris. Mon dieu! Would we be fly casting for old tires and dead cats? Laurent assured me otherwise, that the Seine originates in Burgundy, a three-hour drive from Paris, and that it is a charming rural stream in those environs. So, I signed up and was on a plane to Paris in mid-May. Like many French fishing excursions, it started with a lunch including several bottles of wine, before four of us – three Frenchmen and myself – left the City of Light and drove to the tiny rural village of Aisey-sur-Seine, about 20 miles from the source where the 500-mile long river emerges from a hardly noticeable underground aquifer. On route, we passed many large, beautiful fields of blue flax, which I have never seen in the U.S.

We checked into our gite (a simple cottage) was on the grounds of a fish hatchery called La Chouette (the Owl), and made our preparations for the next day’s fishing. Nearly all the stream fishing in France, and in the rest of continental Europe, is private. Fishing rights on rivers are controlled by individuals, clubs, hotels or other parties that own or lease the land through which the river flows. Sometimes ownership goes back for many centuries. Owners can sell a permit to an angler that allows him to fish on the owner’s section for a day or longer. Even someone who lives on the banks of a river cannot fish in it unless he owns the rights or has acquired the requisite permit.

The Burgundy region was once part of a vast, tropical sea which created limestone soils enriched with crushed shells, which in turn produced the zesty minerality that’s the hallmark of Burgundian wines. Limestone, also often holds underground aquifers, producing spring creeks (sometimes called chalk streams), which are fertile trout habitats. Some of the streams that we intended to explore in Burgundy, including the uppermost Seine, are spring creeks. There are also many spring creeks that provide fine fishing in the U.S., and in our region of Virginia, such as Mossy Run, Spring Run and Buffalo Creek.

If you are familiar with the wines of Burgundy, you may know that the division of vineyards in the Cote d’Or is very complex. This resulted first from the division of the estates of the nobility and churches following the French Revolution, and subsequently from the effect of the French system of inheritance. For example, the Montrachet district, where some of the greatest dry white wines in the world are produced, consists of 19 acres and is divided among 18 individual owners – some owning less than one-tenth of an acre. Interestingly, the last sale of a Montrachet vineyard was in 1993 when approximately one-tenth of an acre sold for over $500,000, which at least partially explains why the wines of Montrachet are so expensive, as are many of the great Burgundies.

The division of fishing rights on Burgundian rivers is not unlike the division of wine districts. A 5-mile section of river could be divided among a half dozen or more owners, with some having only a few hundred yards, or only one bank of a river. The Club’s purpose in exploring the rivers was to, first, evaluate the quality of the fishing and, second, to determine if permits for large enough sections of some rivers could be acquired to accommodate a typical Club outing consisting of a 10-20 anglers. Alas, as is often the case in France, other priorities arose which undermined the completion of our mission.

One of the anglers in our group, Marc, had an uncle, Patrick, a wine merchant who owned the fishing rights to a section of the upper Seine and of a tributary, the Yonne. Marc had persuaded Patrick to let us fish his sections on the two rivers. We arrived at the Seine shortly after 10AM, and our first mission was to survey the waters and learn where we should fish. Patrick’s section was quite long, 2-3 miles, and the viewing required us to follow him through farm fields to observe each part of the river, the flies that were hatching, where the fish were likely to be found, and discuss the appropriate techniques for catching them. By the time we were finished it was past noon, and Patrick announced that his wife Marie had prepared lunch for us back at his 16th Century house. We gathered there and he opened a bottle of Champagne for the five of us, raising a toast to our fishing success. We had just finished the Champagne, when Marie appeared with a platter of five different local Burgundian hams, and baguettes. The hams were incredible, washed down by two different bottles of Chablis, and then a white Burgundy. I was just beginning to think about where on the river I should go to fish, when a huge platter of beef filet appeared which Patrick said was from an animal raised on the farm. The wonderful meat was surrounded by a ring of assorted grilled vegetables and accompanied by two different rich sauces. Of course, a red Burgundy was required to partner with the red meat, then surprisingly Patrick strayed from his roots, and opened a lovely syrah from the Rhone Valley. I was beginning to reach a state of somnolence, when the homemade rhubarb-raspberry pie appeared, though the fifth bottle of wine carried us through the dessert. But Patrick and Marie were undaunted. Burgundian cheeses are renowned, and the next platter included four varieties, all of which were wonderful, with small toasts to put them on and another excellent Rhone Valley wine. Of course, “what is cheese without Port?”, and a bottle was soon opened. Over our repast, we talked with increasing exuberance of fishing, food, wine and anticipated outcomes of the recent unexpected election results in both of our countries. It was the longest, wettest, and most memorable, lunch that I have eaten. After finishing, we four anglers got up (surprisingly, without assistance), donned our waders and other gear, and walked shakily to the river. We began fishing at 6PM, eight hours after we had arrived. Among the four of us we caught a single small trout, and left for the drive back to our abode at dusk, having learned nothing about the river or how to catch its fish.

When we arrived back at the gite after ten o’clock, the Frenchmen insisted that dinner was required before turning in. I have forgotten what was served, but the next morning I observed that we had consumed three more bottles of wine. That day we drove to the other fishing section that Patrick controlled, on the Yonne River, a tributary of the Seine. Not surprisingly, we got a late start, and it was a longer drive. We arrived just in time for lunch at a small fishing cottage on the river, and I was surprised to find Patrick and Marie there to welcome us again. Marie had prepared a lunch consisting entirely of offal, cooked in the traditional French peasant style. The first course looked like ravioli, except that it was minced tripe and innards mixed with a stuffing, and wrapped in tripe. There were sweetbreads, liver and a few things that I could not, or was afraid to, identify. We were still recovering from the previous day’s Bacchanalia, so our wine intake was reduced to only six bottles, and we were all fishing by 4PM. On this river, there was a hatch of green drakes (a very large mayfly that can be found in the U.S., including a few streams in Virginia). Sometimes the big fly brings up the big fish, but it didn’t that day, and our group caught only a few small ones. But it was a pretty stream and, all-in-all, another fine day.

The third day I decided that the risk of eating lunch was too great to consider venturing forth with the rest of my group, so I stayed at the gite to fish the small stream that flowed next to the hatchery, then through the property for another mile or so. On my first cast in a likely looking spot, I was careful and faintly dropped the fly on the water. Nothing happened. On the second cast, I clumsily splatted the fly on the water making a commotion –a beginner’s mistake that usually scares off any fish in the vicinity. Immediately about a dozen trout rushed to my fly, fighting over it before one was hooked. When it worked a second time I realized that these were fish that had escaped from the hatchery into the stream, and that had been accustomed to being fed from a bag by a worker. So, my fly was not replicating a natural insect, but rather a pellet of processed fish food being indiscriminately scattered on the water by someone who views trout as a form of livestock. I caught a couple more, but after about 15 minutes became disgusted with myself, and repaired to the gite to catch up on my reading. My first fishing success had only served to put me in a bad mood.

On our fourth and last day, we fished a different section of the Seine, which was very beautiful. It flowed sinuously through open pastures, with long glides and a few deep runs. In the late afternoon, the green drakes appeared, and as dusk approached, the fish began rising to them. We all caught some nice fish on dry flies, which is everything that this angler hopes for. On the way home, we stopped in a small country restaurant in Aisey-sur-Seine. I remember a fine salad, and the best frogs’ legs that I’ve ever eaten, washed down by a couple of inexpensive Burgundies from uncelebrated villages in this lovely region of France, and accompanied by a convivial group of fellow anglers. There is more to fishing than catching.

Share on Facebook
Facebook
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter
Email this to someone
email

Filed Under: Travel Journal

TRAVEL: Size Matters

June 5, 2017 By Keswick Life

Share on Facebook
Facebook
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter
Email this to someone
email

By Charles Thacher

I can’t pinpoint precisely when my condition started, but the first episode that I can recall was last June, shortly after returning from a two-day float trip fishing for carp on the Cuyahoga River near Cleveland, where perhaps I should have filtered the river water before drinking it. Anyway, I was in Montana to fish the Missouri River with Izzy Short, a guide with whom I’d had some fine days in the past. He’s a grizzled old-timer who rarely speaks and has never responded, or even reacted, to anything that I said unless it related to the next cast or a fish. Although not much fun to be with, Izzy is terrific at spotting fish and putting me in the right position to cast to them, which has always seemed like a fair tradeoff for his dour personality.

On that day, Izzy had found a few fish but I failed to hook them. I can’t remember a slower day on the Missouri. Late in the afternoon, he suddenly stopped the boat, staring intensely downstream. He muttered that he could see a fish rising near the bank. We moved slowly toward the spot, until I finally saw a tiny dimple. He had tied on a section of light leader, and a small fly. As I got ready to cast he put out his hand to stop me, saying “That there is a big fish. Don’t screw it up. And we need a heavier leader for this boy”

I made my first cast, and the fly landed two feet beyond the fish’s head. Izzy exploded. “What the hell you doin’? You’ll spook him. Get that fly out of there, numbnuts. Now!” I raised my rod and started stripping in the fly. As it moved upstream, the fish turned, swam toward it and sucked it in. Flummoxed by my lousy cast, I was not watching the fish, so I didn’t set the hook right away. Perfect technique for a downstream take – the fish hooked itself. It was a powerful one, swimming slowly down the river and taking me into the backing on my reel. Izzy rowed after the fish. Fortunately, the leader held, the fish didn’t find any rocks or logs, and in about ten minutes I brought it to Izzy’s net. That’s when it happened.

As Izzy lifted the fish from the net, cradling it, I excitedly blurted out. “Wow! What a beautiful brown trout. Gotta be twenty inches.”

“What? You messin’ with me? Twenty f…in’ inches? It’s the biggest fish I’ve seen on this river in years. Over twenty-six inches. What you been smokin’, man?”

“No problem Iz. It’s a beauty, but it looks smaller to me. I’m sorry, but it just does.”

“Well, you’re full of crap. The mouth of this net is twenty-four inches wide. And any fool can see that this fish is a lot longer than that. You’re screwed up! You didn’t earn this fish and you sure as hell don’t deserve it. You got no respect.” He let the fish go without even asking whether I wanted a picture, continuing to mumble expletives.

That was it. Izzy rowed hard to the boat takeout and drove me back to my cabin without saying another word. He grabbed my tip with no acknowledgment, jumped in his truck and was gone. The next morning the fly shop manager called to tell me that Izzy had to go to Ulm to get his wife out of jail, and that it was too late to find a replacement. I had a poor day fishing on my own, then left for home, frustrated because, assuming Izzy was right, I landed the fish of a lifetime and not only didn’t get a picture, I didn’t even know that I had done it.

Later, in August, I was up in Quebec for my annual salmon fishing week with my pals from the fishing club. It was always my favorite trip of the year. Even if the catching was bad, we still had a great time eating, drinking and telling worn out stories about the good old days. On arrival night, we had our traditional scotch-infused dinner to kick off what promised to be a great week. In recent years, I had paired up to fish with Willie Stretchit, who lives in New Jersey. I never saw him except on this trip. We’ve always gotten along great, enjoying one another’s company and never quibbling over typical problems like the allocation of water or fishing time. The river was low, and in the first five days, despite our guide Louie working hard, we each caught only two small salmon. Fortunately for our egos, no one else in the camp caught a decent fish either. Late in the last afternoon Willie hooked up with a serious fish. He fought it for about half an hour, which seemed a bit excessive to me, since it wasn’t all that big, but I guess he wanted to savor the first good salmon he had hooked all week. Just as Louie was sliding the net under it a few feet from the bank, it jumped out, took a run and was gone when the leader broke. Willie was pissed and I couldn’t blame him. He yelled at Louie, “What the hell you doin’ Louie? I wait all week to finally get a big fish, and you lose it for me? Damn it, I didn’t even get to measure it or a take a picture!”

Louie was not buying it. “It’s your own damn fault. You kept the line too tight so it broke. What do you expect when you don’t know what the hell you’re doing?” He marched off angrily and Willie followed him, hopefully to patch things up.

Since our guide was gone, I returned to camp. When I got to the dining room, the other guys were already into their first round of drinks – except Willie. Once again, none of them had caught anything worth talking about. They were all ears when I told them “Willie hooked a good one”.

“How big? You got any pictures?”

“Nah. It jumped out of Louie’s net and got away when the leader broke. We never got a picture. But it was probably twenty pounds, maybe a bit bigger. Fought like crazy. Jumped three times. Beautiful fresh fish.”

Just then Willie came in. Manny Fisch, our club president, with more than a slight hint of schadenfreude, said “Hey Willie, heard you lost a twenty pounder.”

“Twenty? You kidding? It was much bigger than that. Who told you twenty?”

“Your partner. Said he saw it. And you know him – he’s truth.”

“Truth, my ass. Charlie, what the hell are you talking about? Louie told me that, based on the size of his net, my fish was about forty-five inches long. And fresh and fat as it was, it had to be over thirty-five pounds. My god, it was the biggest salmon I ever saw, much less caught. How the hell did you come up with twenty pounds?”

“Hey, don’t get your knickers in a knot. I was just guessing. Actually, I said a bit more than twenty, which seemed about right. But if you had managed to land it, we’d know for sure.” The sarcasm was a big mistake.

“You jerk! You know damn well that Louie lost that fish for me. What are you trying to prove here?”

“Not trying to prove anything. Maybe I’m wrong and it was thirty-five or even forty.” Of course, the other guys were delighted to pile on. “C’mon Willie. What’s wrong with twenty pounds? That’s a helluva fish. Way better than anything the rest of us have caught all week. No need to exaggerate. We gotta trust the old guy on this one. He’s seen more salmon than any of us. Besides, he has no dog in this hunt.”

“Yeah Willie. When you’ve been starin’ at the little guys all week, a real salmon looks huge. Course they always keep growin’ once they’re gone.”

Now Willie was even more riled up. “Screw you guys. You can’t catch jackshit. I don’t need this.” He stomped out without even waiting for dinner.

When I returned to our cabin Willie was asleep. Next morning he had packed and left camp by the time I woke up. No goodbye. Guess he was really pissed. On our way back from breakfast, Manny and I happened to see Louie. Manny asked him how big he thought Willie’s fish was.

“It was a really big fish. The biggest I seen all season. Musta been close to forty pounds. Too bad there’s no picture for Willie. But it was not my fault. A big fish like that is hard to get into the net. He had the line real tight. He got too excited and didn’t concentrate.”

Manny turned to me angrily. “What the hell were you looking at? All the years you been salmon fishing and you don’t know the difference between twenty and forty pounds? Who the hell wants to fish with you? Willie’s right. You got a problem.”

“Manny, I’m sorry. I don’t know what happened. I wasn’t trying to mess with Willie’s mind. I was happy that he caught a good fish and I’ll call him and apologize. Tell him what Louie said. He’ll be glad to know that we talked to Louie.”

After getting home, I emailed and called Willie several times to try to repair things, but haven’t heard from him. I told him what Louie said, and apologized. Not sure where he stands for next year. Or me. No doubt Manny and the others told the story to everyone in the club, and I’m probably in the doghouse there too.

In September, I went down to the South Holsten River for my last trip of the season. There were some small olive flies coming off in mid-afternoon and a few fish rising. I picked out what looked to be the best one, and hooked it. After a hard fight, I netted a nice 18-inch brown. Before releasing it I put a mark on my rod so I could measure it exactly when I got home. I was shocked to find it was just over 22 inches, the biggest trout I’ve ever caught on the river. Manny and Willie were right. I did have a problem. The worst problem an angler can ever have. I was underestimating the size of fish. I needed help.

My GP, Harry Pitts, suggested an eye doctor, who had a unique specialty. He was from Alaska – claimed to be an optical Aleutian. When I told him about my problem, he was skeptical. An examination revealed that my eyesight was fine, so it wasn’t a visual problem. Though he probably wanted to suggest that I see a shrink, he referred me to a psycho-neurologist called Dr. Pavlov, whose name rang a bell.

As I explained my condition to Dr. Pavlov, he took copious notes with a broken pencil, which was pointless. At the end of our session, I asked if he had ever heard of my problem before, and was encouraged to hear him say “Yes, but, it’s a condition that I’ve only encountered in women. Usually their husbands send them here. The men complain that the women constantly underestimate the size of, uh, important things. But these things tend to be considerably smaller than the fish you’re describing.”

“Have you been able to treat the problem?” “Not treat it, but I think I’ve fixed it. I just tell them that lying or exaggerating in the cause of connubial bliss is no sin. No wife has come back for further consultation, so I guess it worked. But I’m not sure what to do with you. Perhaps I don’t get it. Do the fish get upset and stop biting if you think they’re smaller than they really are? How would they know?”

“No. It’s other fishermen. They’re kind of like the men who send their wives to you. Except the only size that fishermen care about is that of their fish. And for a fisherman, overestimating is a virtue, while underestimating is rude and unacceptable behavior. So, none of my pals want to fish with me anymore. They’d sooner spend a day noodling with a redneck. I can’t even keep my guides, cause they’re afraid that I’ll ruin their reputations. You have to understand. In fishing, bigger is not just the best thing, it’s the only thing.”

“Do you have the same problem estimating the size of other things?”

“How would I know that? I don’t walk into a market and say ‘gee, I think that zucchini is about two and a half pounds’ or look at a baby, and say ‘wow, that’s a beautiful 24-incher’. But, if a fisherman mentions catching a fish, his buddy asks ‘how big was it?’ And if it wasn’t particularly big, he gets a self-satisfied smile and gives him the ultimate put down, ‘oh.”

Well, if your problem is really that serious, maybe you should just start lying. Whatever you think the size is, say it’s a lot bigger. Won’t that work? Or, when your friends catch a fish, don’t comment on the size. You could say ‘that’s a dandy’, ‘jolly good show’ or something similar that will let them know how impressed you are. After all, what do you care? Fishing’s not a competitive sport, is it?”

“No, that won’t work. I need a cure not a band-aid. I was hoping that you could recommend some pills or maybe even surgery.”

“I can’t. And even if I could, I don’t think your insurance will cover fish enhancement therapy, though I guess it might under the next version of Obamacare. Unfortunately, you’re probably going to have to live with your problem. Maybe you could try golf. Golfers don’t seem to feel any need to embellish their scores.”

Clearly, continuing to see Dr. Pavlov was barking up the wrong tree. But I thought about his question and, over the winter, decided to do some self-therapy. Every place I went, I carried a tape measure and a small scale with a hook on it. If I saw an object that was remotely the same size as a fish, I would estimate the length or weight, and then check it out. It raised a few eyebrows when I was measuring cucumbers at Harris Teeter, but I persisted. I was underestimating nearly everything, so I began mentally adding about 20%, and started getting pretty close. Early this spring I went over to the Cowpasture River to see if my mental adjustment system would work on fish. I caught several good ones, and it did. I was ready to test it under real fishing conditions.

I set up a float trip on the South Holsten this past week with a local guide, Kenny Landit, and called Manny to see if he wanted to join me. At first, he was standoffish, but he finally agreed. We got to the river in the morning. The dark clouds presaged a perfect day for fishing. At the start, there were no fish rising. I persisted with dry flies, while Manny used a nymph. He caught a nice rainbow trout right away, I made my 20% mental adjustment, and blurted out “That’s a beauty, Gotta be close to twenty inches. Kenny, would you mind measuring it. It’s the first good fish I’ve seen this season and I need to get my mental tape measure calibrated”

Kenny pulled out his tape and measured. “You’re right on target. It’s nineteen and a half. A real nice fish.” Manny beamed, and I felt great. Cured! Or at least that’s what everyone would think. My practicing had paid off. We had a great day. Manny caught a fish or two every hour, and I caught a few good ones on dry flies in the afternoon, which was all that I cared about. I continued providing size estimates and no one objected. When we reached the boat pullout, I gave Kenny our tip. “Kenny, that was a great day. Manny, you must have caught about ten and I got five beauties on dry flies. For me, that’s as good as it gets on this river.”

Manny erupted. “What the hell are you talking about? I don’t know how many you caught, but I counted my fish, and I got nineteen. What boat were you in? It was a great day, but your always putting people down sure ruins it. You got a problem and I, for one, am sick of dealing with it. Call someone else next time you want company. I’m finished.” It was a long ride home.

Share on Facebook
Facebook
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter
Email this to someone
email

Filed Under: Travel Journal

TRAVEL: A Solitary Experience

April 28, 2017 By Keswick Life

Share on Facebook
Facebook
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter
Email this to someone
email

By Charles Thacher

I had only four days to fish, and was eager to start. As I headed east from the lodge toward the river, the sun had just cleared the horizon, but was already brilliant in a cloudless blue sky. Another typical Rocky Mountain day in the high desert. The glare disrupted my vision until the towering cliffs blocked the light source when I turned onto the seven-mile access road to descend to the water. It had been more than five years since my previous visit and I was, perhaps naively, surprised to find that the entire road was now paved. Rabbits were scampering everyplace, mostly cottontails, with a few jackrabbits interspersed. Do they favor pavement over dirt, or had I just forgotten that they would be there? A red fox crossed in front of my car, no doubt dreaming of hasenpfeffer.

I rounded a bend and the lovely river came into view. Another bend, and I saw the Little Hole parking lot. OMG! It had been expanded and, it too, was completely paved. Room for at least forty cars I’d guess, though nearly empty at this early hour. I pulled up to the ranger’s booth, and greeted the attendant, a cheerful looking lady. “Good morning. Beautiful day. What’s the damage for parking?”

“My, isn’t it a beautiful day and better still, you’re gonna get a bargain. Four dollars for all day, or ten dollars for four days. The permit’s also good for the lot at the dam.”

“What a deal! I’ll take the four days. Where are all the fishermen?”

“My gosh, it’s not even eight o’clock. Just wait an hour or two. They’ll be here. Always are. More than you’ll want.” Wanting none save myself, I couldn’t disagree.

The Green River rises in the Wind River mountain range in northeastern Wyoming, then flows south and enters Utah in the State’s southeast northeast corner (yes, Utah has two northeast corners), meanders east into Colorado for a short distance, returns to Utah and eventually joins the Colorado River in Canyonlands National Park, after flowing for 730 miles. The Wyoming section of the Green was always a great trout river, but the canyon section in Utah was too warm to support trout, until the completion of the Flaming Gorge Dam in 1964 (named after the most beautiful of the four red canyons that the dam filled) created a new trout fishing section after the river emerges from the bottom of the dam. The dam is impressive – about 500 feet high, 1,300 feet wide, with a reservoir behind it that’s over 90 miles long. From the dam, the river flows cold and clear for about 25 miles, through spectacular red canyons in the upper section, before reverting to its original condition as a muddy desert river (much of the mud flows in from tributaries) that cannot support trout. It continues through the Dinosaur National Monument, a recreational rafting section that is popular for viewing spectacular canyons, full of Native American petroglyphs and numerous signs of dinosaur activity. The confluence of the eponymously colored Green and the dirt brown Colorado, rivers that are roughly equal in size, viewed from an overlook 1,000 feet above, was first described in 1869 by renowned western explorer John Wesley Powell. It is an unforgettable sight – a just reward for a hot and dry 6-mile hike through the desert. But today I was bent on trout fishing.

I thanked the lot attendant, parked, donned my vest and boots, and assembled my rod. I had no waders, since half of my luggage missed the flight out, but no matter, July was a perfect time to wade wet. On Sunday, the guides can’t float with their clients on the seven miles of the Green River from the dam downstream to Little Hole, so I elected to walk upstream. The trail from Little Hole to the dam through the deep canyon provides the only foot access to the seven miles. It’s easy walking and stays close to the water, with a marker at every mile indicating how far you’ve come. I walked briskly, wearing imaginary blinders, accepting that I lacked the willpower to examine the water without wetting a line, and inspired by recalling the size of the parking lot and the attendant’s warning about how many anglers would be coming. Before nine o’clock I reached a spot that I recalled fondly from past trips, roughly a mile and a half from the parking lot, where the river forms a large eddy about ten yards off the bank. Figuring that I would now be out of range of most of the anglers coming behind me, I began to fish.

Trout love eddies, which trap insects in their circulating currents, and there were several nice brown trout hanging out just under the surface waiting for some natural insects to appear. I caught one, then moved on. For about eight hours I worked my way upstream, fishing familiar water, for over a mile. It was a glorious day, temperature in the mid-70s, and nary a cloud showed up. And the physical beauty of that section, with its massive red cliffs and crystal clear rapids and pools reflecting a markedly green hue, is unsurpassed by any river that I have fished. The pines and small willows along the river were full of cicadas, even though it was about a month since they had crawled out of the ground, and once the sun warmed them up, their constant chirping drowned out most other noises along the river. I have rarely seen a cicada actually floating on the Green, but ever since I first came to the river over 20 years earlier, a large dry fly imitating a cicada has been an effective attractor pattern. Unlike a grasshopper, a cicada immediately becomes comatose when it hits cold water. The fish know that cicadas cannot escape, so they rise to take the angler’s artificial cicadas very slowly and deliberately, creating much anticipation whether the fish decides to eat or not. Throughout the day, I used only dry flies – mainly cicada patterns – and caught a couple of nice fish every hour. A fine day. Not like the catching pace of my earliest trips here, but what river, or most anything else, is as good as we remember? An occasional recreational boat passed by me, but it’s a wide river and they moved to the other side, well out of my casting range. I was pleased to not see another wade fisherman in the upper stretch of the river.

On the return walk to my car, I encountered the first angler near the one-mile marker, and then perhaps thirty or so more spread out all the way to the parking lot. Frankly, that’s not a lot of fishing pressure for a large river that reputedly averages over 5,000 fish per mile, and where fish hold in all types of water. But, it’s not the experience that I seek.

On the second morning, I followed the river trail downstream from Little Hole for a couple of miles, which requires climbing about five hundred feet up a hill to get around some cliffs that hug the river and make streamside walking or wading impossible. After re-uniting with the riverbank, I fished downstream for more than a mile, catching about as many nice trout on dry flies as the previous day. This section of the river is more open, has fewer trees near the banks, and thus fewer cicadas. In the late afternoon in a large flat pool, there was a prolific hatch of tiny cream-colored mayflies, and the fish were rising to them eagerly. I had not anticipated encountering such flies, and I found only one fly in my boxes (I carry many hundreds) that was matched the size and color, though not the shape, of the naturals – a size 22  (about 1/6th inch long) midge pattern. Immediately a nice fish took the fly, and broke my 7x (about 2-lb test) tippet when I carelessly struck too hard. After that, as the hatch continued for over an hour, I tried more than a dozen other flies, resulting in lots of anticipation by me, but total rejection by the fish.

Despite my late failures, it was another near perfect day in beautiful surroundings. Only three guided boats passed me and, once again, I did not see another fisherman on foot. Enticed by the prospect of some rising fish and, as I am wont to do, favoring hope over experience, I returned to the same section on the third day, again fishing all day in solitude. The late afternoon hatch returned along with my inability to solve it, since the fly shop had no tiny cream mayflies for sale. But throughout the day lots of fish that weren’t rising came to large chernobyl hopper that looked unlike any creature living in the area or, I suppose, on the planet. I saw a few of the Mormon crickets that inhabit this section of the river. In the copper-colored variety, it is an unusually large and ugly bug. Many times I have tossed them in the water to float over feeding fish and not one has ever been eaten. It’s frustrating to this non-tier of flies that the local fly shops continue to inveigle anglers by selling big flies that match this grotesque creature, rather than the delicate and apparently delicious tiny mayflies.

On my fourth and last day, I drove to the parking lot at the dam, descended the steep switchbacked trail for about 500 feet to the river, and followed it downstream toward Little Hole for over a mile. It is claimed that the first mile of river below the dam has over 15,000 trout. I didn’t count them, but can attest that there are plenty. This section has numerous eddies and foam lines harboring nice fish, but they are almost all tight to the bank, as is the trail. If someone else is fishing ahead of you, many of the best fish will have been spooked, so I arrive early in the morning or the game is not worth the candle. Fortunately, for the fourth day in a row I did not encounter a single wading angler, and I caught some of the largest fish of my trip.

When I first fished the Green, rainbows were the most prevalent type of trout, but browns, brook trout, two varieties of cutthroats, and cutbows, a rainbow-cutthroat hybrid, also came to the net.  On this trip it was about 75% browns and the rest rainbows. I have no idea what has happened to the other varieties, but I missed seeing their brilliant colors.

The Green is one of those big Western rivers, the mention of which to other anglers is often followed by groans and grousing about overcrowding and overfishing. Others that come to mind are the San Juan, Missouri, Madison and Henrys Fork. In fact, these are all very popular and are heavily fished, but primarily within several hundred yards of a parking area, or by floaters who rarely step out of the boat and who will usually move to the other side of the river to avoid wading anglers. My experience is that, on any of these rivers, even in the peak season, if you are willing to walk a mile or so you can fish all day in relative solitude.

Like many anglers, I’m a social creature who is often happiest fishing alone.  I don’t know why. To avoid a competitive situation, or to not be embarrassed by bad technique or bad catching? Perhaps subconsciously, but I don’t think of fly-fishing as a competitive activity, nor do most experienced anglers with whom I have fished. Is it to have the best spots on the river to myself? There’s probably something to that but, frankly, sharing a large river with other anglers leaves plenty of opportunity for enjoyment and success. In fact, if I spent less time walking and more time standing and observing, I have no doubt that I would catch more and larger fish.

There are pools on some rivers that I have fished frequently that I think of as “my pools”. They may not be the best pools on the river, but they have been good to me, either because they play on my fantasies by appearing to be perfect trout pools, or because they have shown me memorable fish or fish hooked in a memorable way. My recollections of such pools are more clearly etched if I first came upon them while alone – certainly without a guide. When I travel to a river only to find a stranger already fishing one of “my pools”, it is a deflating experience indeed. I can’t explain it, and it seems juvenile, but it is what it is and I don’t expect it to change.

But back to the Green. It’s a lovely river in a spectacular setting with more than ten miles of water accessible solely by walking or boat. Dry flies can be used effectively all day. You can leave the East early in the morning, arrive in Salt Lake City about noon, drive four hours, and be fishing by late afternoon. There are decent accommodations and restaurants nearby, as well as two good fly shops, Just don’t expect to buy any size 22 flies.

Share on Facebook
Facebook
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter
Email this to someone
email

Filed Under: Travel Journal

TRAVEL: A Sojourn on the San

March 7, 2017 By Keswick Life

Share on Facebook
Facebook
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter
Email this to someone
email

By Charles Thacher

Several Augusts past, a small group of dissolute regulars was gathered at the communal long table of my New York angling club for lunch, to imbibe in a wee dram and exchange the customary dubious tales of fishing exploits and expectations. Someone posited “So, anyone got any interesting trips coming up”.

I took the bait. “Actually, yeah. I’m going to Poland next month”

“Poland? What do you catch there? Gefilte fish?”

“Wouldn’t it be easier to just go to Buffalo?”

“Maybe when you’re there you can find out how many Poles it takes to…..?”

As tasty as the club’s food is, I’m not sure that it’s worth the verbal abuse that often stalks the long table. But, come September, off I went. After some sightseeing in Warsaw I flew southeast to Rzeszów, a city in the Carpathian foothills, about 35 miles equidistant from the borders with Slovakia and the Ukraine. From the latter part of the 18th Century until the end of WWI, this region was included in the Austrian Empire (with the rest of the former Poland being split between Prussia and, Russia), then was part of an independent Poland for the two decades between the wars, until it was invaded and occupied by the Russians just two weeks after the better-known German invasion of Poland in September 1939. Later during WWII, the Russian occupiers were supplanted by the Germans, then from 1945 until 1990 a communist government directed from Russia was in control, after which Poland became a democratic republic once again. A dismal history indeed. During those long periods of occupation and subjugation many Poles left the country for greener pastures, particularly the U.S. In fact, until recently, the Polish community in Chicago was larger than Warsaw.

On Saturday afternoon, I wandered into Rzeszów’s town square, lined with outdoor bars and restaurants, to discover that a music festival had just begun, featuring local song and dance groups, both folk and classical.  Most of the classical music was by Frédéric Chopin, the famed 19th Century composer and pianist who was one of history’s great musical prodigies and continues to be a revered Polish national hero, despite the fact that he left the country at age twenty, became a French citizen, and never again returned. The festival was capped off with a free concert by Andrzej Cierniewski, a senior citizen and one of the Country’s most popular entertainers, who might be described as the Polish Neil Diamond, except for the fact that Diamond himself is of Polish heritage. In any event, the audience, which packed the square, reacted to Cierniewski with similar loud enthusiasm, as did I. So good, so good!

The next morning Richard, my guide, picked me up and we drove for an hour to a house where I was to stay on the lower San River, which flows out of a reservoir, near the Bieszczady National Park – a major wilderness area. He told me that he had previously lived in Afghanistan, South Africa and Costa Rica, then for over twenty years in Chicago, returning to his village in Poland a few years earlier to care for his parents. He had a steady stream of exotic stories, or perhaps tall tales. When we arrived at the house, he asked to examine my flies. I showed him a typical assortment of common patterns, but also two boxes of tiny flies that I use on a few spring creeks and tail waters, when I don’t want to catch any fish. Surprisingly, he was most impressed with this collection of mysterious miniatures, noting that “no one ever brings flies like those here.”

Being astute, I immediately grasped the importance of Richard’s observation. If no one ever brought flies like those, then the fish had never seen their like. They would be easily inveigled and, perhaps, I would become a legend of the San. The American who untied the piscatorial Gordian Knot. The fishing hadn’t even started and I was already flushed with success.

The house is managed by Wojtek, an owner of the guiding operation.  He shops, cooks, cleans, occasionally guides and oversees his two young children while his wife works and lives during the week three hours away in Kraków. I met Dadek, his tow-headed two-year old son who constantly referred to himself in the first person as “Bebish”, for reasons that only he understood. Bebish and I got along famously because my half dozen words of Polish were among the few dozen that he had mastered.  During the week, an interesting collection of other guests – an American, a Brit, two Frenchmen and a Pole – showed up, seemingly unannounced. Some days one of them would fish with me, and at night they consumed prodigious quantities of vodka, the mother’s milk of Poland.

The first morning we futzed around after breakfast before finally leaving to fish at well past ten o’clock. As always at the start of a trip, I was a bit antsy, but as the week moved along, it became clear that there was no reason to get going early. The River’s six-mile fishing section is divided into eight designated beats, and to fish them requires obtaining a special permit each day. The first day, we stopped at the house of a forest ranger to get our assigned beat. When we arrived at our beat, two cars were already parked there and several anglers were in the water casting in earnest. No worries, Richard drove around until he found another beat that was empty and we fished there. This strange ritual repeated itself for all six days that I fished, with other anglers always at our assigned beat, but with another beat (that was assigned to someone else) always being empty and available.  And I never had to fish the same beat twice. But I did wonder why they bothered assigning beats. Perhaps it’s like screwing in a lightbulb.

The San, and its large population of brown trout and grayling, was a local secret until 1985 when the World Fly Fishing Championship was held there. As stories of the competitors’ success spread, anglers from all over Europe began flocking there. Because there were no fishing regulations, the fish population was decimated in a few years.  In the early 90s regulations were implemented and, today, it has a very large population of fish – perhaps too large.

The World Championship returned to the San in June, 2010. Poland has twice won the gold medal, trailing well behind the leader, the Czech Republic which has won nine, followed by France, Italy and England with seven, six and five, respectively. A U.S. team has competed every year, but has won only two medals – a silver and a bronze. We rank behind the likes of Slovakia and Wales, which by the way, is not even a country. This is an outrage! OMG, we invented the San Juan worm and the stomach pump. We spend the most effort and money on river conservation and restoration and what has it gotten us? Two lousy also-ran medals and a tarnished reputation – the laughing stock of the elite angling world. We need a blue-ribbon commission of angling nabobs to get to the bottom of this scandal, lest we continue to embarrass ourselves.

When we arrived at the beat I was impressed by the river’s width (30-50 yards across at most spots), its accessibility (mostly 3-4 feet deep throughout with gentle currents) and its physical beauty (lined with forest, bushes and meadows, and with virtually no development visible). Nothing happened on the water until about early afternoon when tiny olive mayflies began appearing, and the fish started to rise. Most of the rises were very subtle – tiny dimples. I thought probably fish feeding just below the surface. As usual, ignoring my own observation, I put on a small dry fly for half an hour with the predictable result – nothing. Then I picked out a small emerger pattern, and cast that in  front of some feeding fish. On my third or fourth try it drifted ten feet past the fish that I was casting to and began swinging across the current when another fish took it. As I landed a small trout, Richard came over to inspect. He complimented me on my success in matching the hatch. I readily, though with the requisite humility, accepted his approbation with an all-knowing nod, being too vain to admit that it was dumb luck and that, in fact, I had no idea what the fish wanted.

My initial experience repeated itself each day. Early in the afternoon, fish began rising steadily, and I caught a two or three an hour using a variety of different diminutive patterns, with the same one rarely catching more than a fish or two. It was engaging, because fish were rising constantly within casting distance, but it was frustrating because I couldn’t solve the problem. But I got satisfaction from the fact that Richard couldn’t either.

Richard told me that the fish in the San are roughly 2/3rds grayling and 1/3rd trout, though I caught primarily trout. The largest were about 15”, though most were 10-12”, which disappointed. I have met other anglers who have fished the San earlier in the season and who have caught larger fish, perhaps because the flies hatching at that time are larger, or maybe they knew what they were doing. The San is popular among British anglers because it’s one of the few rivers that offers a good chance to catch a grayling of well over 20”, and the Brits love large grayling more than pickled kippers.

As we walked and drove along the San, we saw much wildlife.  Roe deer, huge rotund European hares that looked like they had eaten too many vegan pierogies, blue and white herons, swans, ducks, geese, kingfishers, cranes and many other birds were common. Eagles and large owls were seen more than once. Richard said that he sometimes sees beavers, wild boars and red stags, and less often bears and wolves that reside in the National Park, which is also home to some of the few remaining European bison. The mute white storks, which are revered and treated as royalty in Poland, and can often be seen nesting on rooftops, had already left on their annual migration to Egypt. Occasionally Richard would interrupt his stories to divagate in search of wild mushrooms, a favorite activity of Poles everywhere.

The many small villages dotting the landscape in the San valley are charming, and seem quite prosperous. That’s impressive, given Poland’s long history of devastation by its neighbors, particularly the Germans and Russians, but even the Swedes and Lithuanians. From 1939-45, more than 6,000,000 Poles were killed, an awful carnage roughly equivalent to a 9-11 attack on every day in that 6-year period. Millions more were exiled or escaped, most never to return. Lesko, the largest town on the upper San, lost about 80% of its population during the War. The wartime destruction was followed by 45 years of oppressive and incompetent communist rule. How does such a country, in just over two decades, recover to the point that it looks like much of Western Europe? I don’t know, but it is a great tribute to the will, energy and spirit of the Polish people. Poland still has significant challenges – both political and economic – but that doesn’t dim the luster of what has been accomplished. It is inspiring to observe this remarkable rebirth firsthand.

On my last day, I was fishing late in the afternoon to a pod of sipping grayling. I heard voices behind me, and turned around to see three attractive young ladies standing on the bank, dressed in skimpy halters and what, in the 70s, we called “hot pants”. When they saw that I had noticed them they began talking to me, so I called Richard over to interpret.  He was, well, interested. I asked him what they were saying. “They’re local college girls and they want us to catch them a fish for dinner. If we do, we can go with them while they drop it off at home, and then they’ll buy us a drink at a club in town.” So, I was now presented with several dilemmas. First, it was a no-kill section. Would this be an extenuating circumstance that justified killing a fish, something like murder in self-defense? Second, I’m more than fifty years older than them and not all that spiffy (not to mention that I’m married). Third, and most significant, I had been fishing over the same pod for the last hour and hadn’t come close to hooking a fish.  Now, with the added pressure, I’d probably have no chance. But being empathetic with Richard’s concupiscence (I, of course, was impervious to their charms), I increased my efforts, frantically changing flies every several casts, sadly without success. When I turned around and asked Richard to reassure the trio that I was still in the game, he pointed out that they had given up and left, probably to find someone fishing with worms.

During the occasional downtime on the San, as during the downtime on many other distant rivers, I thought about why I would travel so far, and at such inconvenience, for a fishing experience that is often measurably no better, and sometimes not as good, as I can get on rivers in the U.S.  I suppose that the answer defies logic. I travel to distant places because there is fishing, and yet if the fishing results fall short of my hopes or expectations, it often does not diminish my enjoyment of the experience. And that’s a good thing, because fishing is fraught with risk and unpredictability. There is nothing original in these thoughts. Way back in 1774, English author Charles Bowlker, in The Art of Angling, put fishing in its proper perspective with exceptional clarity:

Remember that the wit and invention of man were given for greater purposes than to ensnare silly fish: and that, how delightful soever angling may appear, it ceases to be innocent when used otherwise than as mere recreation.

What a valuable thought to keep in mind as I plan my next fishing trip.

Share on Facebook
Facebook
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter
Email this to someone
email

Filed Under: Travel Journal

TRAVEL: Privileged Fishing

February 4, 2017 By Keswick Life

Share on Facebook
Facebook
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter
Email this to someone
email

By Charlie Thacher

I turned south on the dirt road out of Craig, Montana, drove about a mile along the river and parked at a familiar spot – a slight rise overlooking the large corner pool that local anglers call “the bay of pigs”, presumably for the monster fish that inhabit its depths. I sidled down the first hill, then clambered over a railroad car that was part of a 5-mile string that the BNSF Railway had left on the tracks for the past six months, either due to the downturn in the economy or as punishment to the locals for voting down the conversion of the trunk line’s tracks into a bike path, dependent on whose version of the truth you chose to believe. After jumping off the railroad car, I slid down the grass on the next hill to the water’s edge, walked downstream to the first bend in the river, and began looking for noses and tails.

It was late July, about six in the evening on one of America’s great trout rivers. Prime time. From where I was standing, I could see up and down the broad Missouri for nearly a mile. Not another wade fisherman was in sight, even though both banks within my view (and all of the ten miles or so further upstream to the dam), are accessible to the public for wade fishing.  As no fish were rising, my mind wandered, and I thought about how fortunate it is that I can drive along a river and walk in to fish almost any spot that I please.  In the previous four days, I had a similar experience on two other legendary Western rivers – the Henrys Fork and the Madison – walking the banks and wading for many miles. Of course, most of our rivers can be accessed the same way.  But, it is not everywhere thus.

Just a few weeks earlier I had spent four days fishing one of the legendary trout streams of Europe – Austria’s Traun River –an hour east of Salzburg. Prior to that, I had fished (while Ann toured) the Loue River in eastern France with the Fario Club (the fly fishing club of Paris) for our annual outing, along with guests from the London and Munich Fly Fishing Clubs. The Loue is a beautiful river, and we had access to about six miles of it (all of which was private) through the extraordinary generosity of Fario Club members.  Although the fishing was fine, it may have been surpassed by the food and wine, although my recollection of that is somewhat dimmed from overindulgence. Luckily for me, one thing I did recall was that a member of the Munich Club had provided me with an introduction to his friend, Erhard Loidl, a part owner of a fly shop on the Traun.

After dropping Ann off for her sojourn at a spa hotel in the charming Austrian lakeside town of Fuschl am See, I arrived at my hotel, the Wirt am Bach in Oberweis, near the Traun, and was greeted by Erhard. The Traun is restricted to fishing by permit, and only a few are available to the public for a daily fee of about S115 each. It’s a large river, flowing for 100 miles before reaching the Danube, and each of its angling sections has a different name. My permit covered an 8-mile stretch called the Gmundner Traun, which flows out of the Traunsee, a large lake girded by impressive snow-capped peaks.

The Traun is a venerable fishery. Local records indicate that in the year 1360, a wealthy trader acquired the right “to fish for grayling and trout by means of feathered hooks” from the abbot of Lambach Monastery. That precedes the earliest known mention of fly fishing in English literature by 136 years.  Sir Humphrey Davy, an Englishman who was the world’s greatest chemist during the first half of the 19th Century, the inventor of one of the earliest light bulbs, and a prominent angling author, praised the Traun’s beauty and its fish in his 1828 classic Salmonia or Days of Fly Fishing. The mid-20th Century writer and legendary international angler, Charles Ritz (also of hotel fame), was a devotee of the Traun. The prospect of fishing a river with such a storied history and tradition was exciting.

Although the Gmundner Traun flows through a busy, developed suburban area, it is gin clear and pristine. The river can rarely be seen from the road. Many of the fishing access points are very hard to find, and Erhard’s tour of them no doubt saved me many hours of frustration.  Walking trails lead from the access points to the river and follow most of its length. The portion of the river that I fished was lined on both sides by a forest of mature trees, giving the feeling of fishing in a remote wilderness. The water was high for late June, and Erhard cautioned me that many good fishing spots would be inaccessible for wading. Although we saw few flies on the river, he suggested that a large green caddis, fished on the surface or below, would likely be the ticket, which proved accurate. As we stood above a riffle swapping fishing stories, I hooked several rainbows as my fly aimlessly bobbed up and down in the water – a good sign.

I asked Erhard about other Austrian rivers that he might recommend. He responded that Austria had the finest and most diverse trout fishing in Europe – but that all rivers are private. Most fishing rights are controlled by individuals, clubs or hotels and those that are accessible to the public require a permit, which often must be reserved in advance for a fee that is sometimes well in excess of what I was paying.  I inquired how young people learn to fly fish. The answer is that they usually don’t unless they have a mentor who has fishing rights on a river, or they can learn on a lake.  We discussed the relative merits of the American and Austrian systems, with Erhard pointing out the effectiveness of their system which puts fishing rights in the hands of those who are invested in, and are zealous about, protecting the fisheries from environmental abuse and overfishing, and me emphasizing that our system gives access to a valuable and pleasurable resource to those without power or wealth and creates wide public support for preservation of the fisheries. The Austrian system is the same as has existed throughout Europe for centuries, and is unlikely to change. Nor is ours. The discussion gave me a new appreciation for the privilege of my unfettered access to most American rivers. Would I trade this for private control (if I could afford and obtain it) of a few fine rivers near my home? Fortunately, there is no need for me to ponder this question.

The last stop on Erhard’s introductory tour was his fly shop in Steyermuhl, downstream from Oberweis.  I bought some of his innovative caddis patterns, and he gave me a signed copy of the impressive book on entomology for European fly fishers that he and his partners produced in 2002, which is now available in many languages (not English). I can read scarcely a word of the German text, but it is beautifully produced with remarkable photographs of insects.  Erhard then took me down a trail near the shop to a spot where the river backed up behind a weir, forming a large deep pool.  He said that it was called “the place where fish always rise”.  It was living up to its reputation at that moment, as many large fish were dimpling.  The problem was getting a cast to them. The only place to stand was a narrow ledge about fifteen feet long in front of a wall, and a roll cast was required.  Erhard pointed out to me that they were feeding on the small spinners (the stage in the mayfly’s metamorphosis after mating and egg laying, that lasts a few hours, just before death) that were on the water, and that, as I cast to them, they would spook, continually moving further away.  They did. After about half an hour observing my futility, he left to drive to his home in Vienna, and I returned to the hotel to unpack. While walking back to the car Erhard pointed out a large pike lounging in a few feet of water near the bank. He said that pike of over 40 pounds had been caught in the river. I salivated.

That evening I couldn’t resist returning to the place of the rising fish – and they still were. I tied a small spinner on a very light leader, and began casting. Surprising myself, I hooked four fish. The first one showed why Traun rainbows are known for their fighting qualities. It took out line rapidly, got into my backing, then broke off. I changed to a slightly heavier leader and managed to land one of the other three – a beautifully colored and feisty 3-pound rainbow. While fishing, I witnessed something that I had not observed before. A group of about a dozen ducks were circling the pool, feeding voraciously on the spinners that blanketed the surface, and every half hour or so they would come around in front of me. They didn’t spook the fish, but during the ten minutes or so before they moved on, I had to suspend casting to avoid hooking a feathered sipper.  I don’t know if the catch and release fishing regulations applied to ducks.

The next morning I walked down a driveway near the hotel, then through a yard to a section that has a series of islands. No fish were rising, so I put on a caddis nymph. On the third cast I hooked and landed a nice rainbow. Minutes later a brown, then a grayling and, finally, a beautiful brook trout. Four varieties in about an hour, while hardly moving. When I returned to the fly shop, I mentioned the brook trout to Erhard’s partner and co-author. He expressed disbelief, saying that in 25 years on the river he’d never heard of anyone catching a brook trout. Though doubting me, he made a phone call to a local fisheries biologist who confirmed that it was unlikely, but possible, as a few renegade brook trout could unintentionally be among the several thousand hatchery rainbows that are annually added to the wild fish in the river.  I felt vindicated – and blessed.   

Over the remainder of the three days I walked about five miles of the river, encountering only three or four other anglers. Although I didn’t see any wardens, anglers I met told me that there is little poaching, because if someone is caught, the penalty is severe. I continued to catch fish on a variety of caddis fly imitations. Every so often I would encounter a pair of white swans, a few with cygnets. They were the friendliest, or least intimidated, swans that I’ve met. Sometimes, when I had managed to get only a few feet out into the river, they would push me out a bit further, as they swam between me and the bank. I didn’t see them eating flies.

On my last afternoon, I fished a beautiful section that is known for having been a particular favorite of Ritz. A shallow riffle formed a delta-shaped shelf, with a prepossessing deep run on each side, turning into a long flat glide of over a hundred meters. A fishy looking spot indeed. I caught a few in the runs, and then saw a swirling rise about 20 yards out in the glide that was clearly a large fish, based on the amount of water that it pushed upstream. Four or five casts drifting a floating fly produced no response. Then I skittered the fly across the surface in front of where the fish had risen and it immediately rose and ate. It rolled and I could see that it was very large, undoubtedly one of the biggest fish of my life. A brown trout I guessed, given that it was feeding in slow water. After several long, powerful runs, I got it to within about ten yards of me, and the line broke. On examination, the break was neat, with no curlicue that would indicate a failed knot that I had tied. In my fashion, I mentally beat myself up for not having checked for knots caused by my poor casting, or abrasions, in the leader before trying for such a nice fish. To punish myself for my inattention to detail, I quit the river, and returned to my car to go pick up Ann and drive on to Salzburg.

If there is a lovelier country than Austria, I haven’t been there. The scenery around the many lakes east of Salzburg is spectacular. But even with such a distraction, as I drove I couldn’t get the lost fish, and my carelessness, out of my mind. Opportunities to catch unusually large fish are rare. Why am I not more disciplined and patient? How many more nice fish must I lose before I learn to take better care of my leader? Am I too old to shed my bad habits? If only I had gotten the fish in close to where I could see it, I would have felt much better. I was disconsolate. But then I remembered the large pike that Erhard showed me and his tale of the giants that inhabit the river, particularly in slower water. Yes, of course, it was a pike, whose sharp teeth would easily cut a trout leader. So, it wasn’t my fault. I was innocent. It was unavoidable. I was redeemed –  and quite pleased that I had found the obvious answer.  On such a slender thread hangs my optimism regarding my next fishing trip.

Share on Facebook
Facebook
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter
Email this to someone
email

Filed Under: Travel Journal

TRAVEL: The Other 41st Parallel

January 2, 2017 By Keswick Life

Share on Facebook
Facebook
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter
Email this to someone
email

By Charlie Thacher

Ann Thacher on a beautiful and nearly deserted beach

A few years ago, on a cold November day I was having lunch at the St. Andrews Pub in New York’s midtown with a few of my fly-fishing buddies. Someone mentioned that he had just read and enjoyed James Prosek’s book Fly-fishing the 41st, an engaging tale of traveling and fishing around the globe following the northern 41st parallel, starting from the Author’s home in Connecticut, which inspired another to comment “You know, someone should do the same thing for the 41st parallel in the Southern Hemisphere.” The idea was so brilliant, and thus its emergence among our usually soporific group so startling, that several of us choked on our haggis. But then, the inevitable damp rag fell. “Hey, it’s just not that interesting. You’ve got New Zealand and the Lake Districts in Argentina and Chile. We’ve all been there and, anyway, people write about those places all the time. There’s nothing else.” So, another idea was shot to hell and we all went back to discussing our favorite pellet fly patterns.

But nothing else was all I had to do, so I went home and pulled out an atlas. Three months later, Ann and I were on a plane to Tasmania.

The island of Tasmania is a separate Australian state, about 150 miles south of the mainland, at a similar latitude to the northern two-thirds of New Zealand’s South Island. It’s smaller than the South Island – about the size of West Virginia – with a rugged and remote southwestern quarter latticed with deep, heavily forested gorges that render it mostly uninhabitable. The Island’s total population is only about 500,000, with roughly 70% living in and around its two principal cities – Hobart (the capital) in the south and Launceston in the north. Both cities are modern, with fine amenities and considerable colonial charm.

A mama kangaroo with the joey (baby) in her pouch

Tasmania has several claims to fame. It was settled (or its Aboriginal peoples might say “invaded”) in the early 19th Century almost entirely by convicts from English prisons (mostly Irish and Scottish) and others on the lam from various far-flung places. It was the birthplace of two intriguing film actors who were prominent from the 1930s through the 1950s – Errol Flynn and Merle Oberon.  Flynn was a true son of Tasmania, although he left the Island for England in his teens, and ultimately spent most of his life in America, becoming a major Hollywood star, matinee idol, and legendary lothario (think “in like Flynn”). But Oberon’s story is the more interesting. The exotic-appearing actress, who was often described in terms such as “hauntingly beautiful”, was born in Hobart to affluent parents, moved to India after her father’s death, to be raised by her godparents, then at age 17 moved alone to England, where she met the eminent Hungarian film producer Alexander Korda, who hired her for a first starring film role in 1933. Two years later she married Korda, the first of her four husbands. Oberon became a renowned beauty and star in both England and America, appearing in over 50 films. She was revered in Tasmania as a heroine –living proof that Tassies could break away from their remote beginnings and accomplish great things on the world stage. In 1978, at age 67, she made a celebrated first return to Hobart and promptly announced to the press and her fans that she was born in India, and had never before set foot on the Island. The revelation crushed her Tassie followers, some of whom still refuse to believe that she was not one of them. Apparently, upon hiring her, Korda had decided that the world was not ready to idolize an Indian-born actress, especially one of mixed ethnic parentage, and had invented Tasmania as her faux birthplace because it sounded exotic and mysterious, as was she. Oberon herself perpetuated the story for nearly 50 years, even contriving many anecdotes about her early Tassie life. A year after her visit she died in Malibu.   

Hikers’ bridge over lovely trout stream

Tasmania is the also home to some of the world’s most exotic animals, including several that are found nowhere else on earth. And finally, of importance to anglers, it is the source of New Zealand’s trout, which arrived on the Island from England in the 1860s.

Surprisingly, Tasmania’s angling reputation was greater in the first half of the 20th Century than it is today. Between about 1930 and 1960, anglers came from around the world to fish the famed “Shannon Rise” – a hatch of caddis flies on the Shannon River spanning several weeks that was among the most prolific in the world. Today, Tasmania is not a major fishing destination, probably due to a combination of a decline in the quality of fishing in some of the island’s more prominent rivers (the Shannon River is now heavily silted) and the continued development of the extraordinary New Zealand fishery. And, for most of the world’s anglers, New Zealand is a shorter trip than Tasmania.

A friendly wombat

However, I was intent on completing my southern 41st Parallel experience, so Tasmania it was. Prior to my fishing, Ann and I spent six days traveling around the Island. It’s a delightful experience. The roads are excellent (driving on the right) with light traffic, although it may be the road-kill capital of the world. Carcasses of the Island’s many nocturnal animals litter the roads, and they stay around to become maggot homes, because there are few avian scavengers and the population of Tasmanian devils, those ferocious marsupials that will eat everything including one another, has been dramatically reduced by a deadly virus. A fly-tier seeking the hair of wombat or wallaby, or even a devil, would be in heaven.  The friendly wallabies can be seen everyplace – in parking lots, on the beaches, even bouncing through towns. The Tasmanian tiger-wolf, a carnivorous marsupial much bigger than the devil, became officially extinct in the 1930s, although unconfirmed sightings are occasionally reported in the Island’s wild southwest quarter.

Tasmania has 19 national parks, offering countless hiking opportunities. The views along the seacoast were particularly beautiful, reminding us of Cornwall. We saw much of the exotic wildlife, including the rare and reclusive echidna, a small spiny creature with a long slender snout, that is one of the Island’s (and the world’s) only two monotremes – egg laying mammals that suckle their young. Oh, and lest I forget, the Island’s food, beer and wine is first-rate, particularly the low-production pinot noirs which rarely venture off-island.

After our travels, I dropped Ann at the Launcestown airport for her 30+ hour trip home, and I went on to Riverfly, my fishing lodge.  It is situated on a sheep farm on the North Esk River, about 45 minutes southeast of Launceston. The owner, Daniel Hackett, greeted me and informed me that I was the only guest for the next five days. Well, at least I wouldn’t have to rush to the table for first dibs on the food.

The first two days I fished several small streams – the Macquarie, the South and  North branches of the Esk and Brumbys Creek – with two different guides. Although Tasmania (and, in fact, all of Australia) was in the middle of a severe drought, a very recent rain had made the streams slightly off-color. The guides were fine, but the fishing with dries and nymph droppers was slow, the few fish I caught were small, and the experience was a bit disappointing. But the food and wine at the lodge were excellent, so the days ended on a higher note.

For the last three days, Daniel was my guide. The first day we went to the St. Patricks River, a small, pretty stream hemmed in by willows. Fortunately, Daniel loaned me his 7-foot rod, and even with that a lot of roll casting was required. In most pools, Daniel spotted fish, some of which were rising (even I could see those), and I caught many 12”-15” inch browns. We arrived at one small log-jammed pool and Daniel mentioned that a large fish resided within that had been hooked four previous times this season, but never landed. Sure enough, after a few casts I hooked the allegedly elusive resident. He must have still been exhausted from his prior struggles, because he came to the net with little resistance. A pretty 20” brown.

The exotic platypus

But that big brown was not the highlight of the St. Pats. While standing under a canopy of willows, while Daniel had gone back to bring up the car, I saw at the head of a pool what looked like a trout’s back push through the water, then disappear. A minute later, I noticed a creature roughly the size and color of a muskrat swimming toward me. As it moved closer I saw the distinctive duck bill. A platypus, the other monotreme, and a mythical creature that I had only ever seen in books, swam right past my leg. I could have reached out and touched it, which as I learned later, would have been stupid given the seriously venomous spur that it carries on its hind foot. And, to compound my pleasure, a few moments later a screeching flock of large white cockatoos flew away, their slender yellow crests reflecting the bright sunlight hidden from my view. There is more to fishing than catching.

One slightly disarming aspect of wade-fishing in Tasmania, is that the guides are constantly prodding the ground ahead, trying to spook snakes that prefer living along rivers. There are only three species on the Island, but all are highly venomous and among the world’s deadliest, with the most common and dangerous being the tiger snake, which can reach a length of over six feet. The guides said that the same anti-venom works for all three species, but I was glad not to test that theory. The only snake that I saw was a large one that crossed the road in front of our car. I didn’t get out to check the species.

The next day, Daniel hitched up his rubber boat, and said that we were off to Brumbys Creek. I can’t say that I was thrilled, since my previous experience on the Creek was disappointing and it wasn’t nearly large enough to accommodate a boat. When we arrived at the launch site two things were obvious – this part of Brumbys looked more like a pond then a stream and the reeds protruding from the water were so thick that there didn’t appear to be any place to fish. But I stepped in, and Dan proceeded to push us through a hundred meters of reeds to open water. For the rest of the day we floated a few kilometers downstream in what looked like the biggest spring creek that I have ever seen. In some places, it was several hundred meters wide. Daniel explained that there are three weirs in Brumby’s, and that above each weir the water backs up to form this spring-creek like environment.

Despite having to cast from the boat (not normally my choice), it was a wonderful day of fishing. Large browns were often finning and tailing in the many narrow channels and pockets, and when they weren’t, Daniel proved to be one of the best fish-spotters that I’ve ever seen. He was also a skilled boatman, which was essential given the gusting wind and complex currents. The fish were mostly in the 15”-20” range, and were very skittish and challenging. I hooked a bunch, lost some, but had countless opportunities – which is all that I ever hope for. The most exciting targets were fish that came six inches out of the water, attempting to eat dragon and damsel flies that were hovering in the air. So, I discovered that Brumbys was, in fact, two different creeks.

The last day, Daniel again hitched up his boat and said that we were off to the Macquarie, another river that had previously disappointed me. But it was a different river way downstream – wide, deep and slightly off-color, which was slightly off-putting. Using an electric motor, we headed upstream and came to a fork, where a lovely, clear freestone river, lined with high grassy banks, came in from the left. Daniel announced that it was my old friend again – Brumbys Creek – below the third weir. Not a bit like the other two sections that I had fished.   

Daniel suggested that we get out and wade-fish upstream, and I didn’t need convincing. It was mid-February (think mid-August in the U.S.) and he hoped that the fish would finally be on hoppers. They were. The rest of the day we walked up the schizophrenic Brumbys. I casted to lovely browns that occasionally rose, Daniel spotted others, and many were seduced by the hopper when I was able to place it under the cut banks. There is something in the slapdash way that a trout takes a hopper that I always eagerly anticipate, no matter how much action I’ve already had. It was a fine day – my third in a row.

For anglers, Tasmania is not New Zealand. I didn’t catch a single fish over 20”, which is a small fish in most Kiwi streams. But Tasmania has its own charms, not the least of which is the scenery and far more wildlife. And, for a more intrepid angler than I, it has hundreds of rivers that are virtually unfished, where those eight pound monsters could be lurking. Oh, and one might encounter a deadly snake, a platypus or even the devil.

Share on Facebook
Facebook
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter
Email this to someone
email

Filed Under: Travel Journal

TRAVEL: Peanut Island

December 10, 2016 By Keswick Life

Share on Facebook
Facebook
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter
Email this to someone
email

By Joseph S. Shields

There is a place called Peanut Island.  It is in Florida and I have been there.  You would think it is shaped like a peanut, but it’s not.

Peanut Island was created in 1918 with excavation debris from the construction of the Palm Beach Inlet.  It was originally called Inlet Island, but the name changed after plans were made to use the island for a peanut-shipping operation.  The venture never happened but the name stuck.

Aerial photographs reveal the tiny landmass is perfectly circular, as you would expect from an artificial undertaking by humans.  The inlet connects Lake Worth lagoon to the Atlantic Ocean and maintains a depth of 35 feet.

During the Cuban Missile Crisis, Navy Seabees built a nuclear fallout shelter on Peanut Island for President John F. Kennedy.  The bunker was situated 5 minutes by helicopter and 15 minutes by boat from the Kennedy estate in Palm Beach.  The bunker would have literally been JFK’s last resort.

People often visit Peanut Island Park to tour the bunker and the U.S. Coast Guard Station that used to be situated there.  My kids, however, weren’t interested in a maritime museum or remnants from the Cold War.  Instead of spending part of the day underground, we spent the afternoon underwater swimming with fish.

The children asked the captain if they could jump in after he dropped anchor.  Captain Ron (yes, like in the movie) was worried about the current and tossed a line out so they could grab it and pull themselves back to the yacht.

“I can’t get much closer,” he said.  “If you guys are good simmers and want to swim to the island you can.”

My brother-in-law arranged the afternoon excursion for a break from late-December holiday festivities.  His friend owns the boat—we’ll call it “Cliché” (Newport, Rhode Island)—and keeps it in Palm Beach during the winter season.

“They grow up so fast!” my brother-in-law exclaimed, watching his niece and nephews jump overboard.  All three were quickly taken away by the flow of water.  They expertly swam against the current and grabbed the rope.

“You should avoid using annoying clichés,” I said.  “That one has had its day.”

“But cliché’s are always true, which is why people started saying them.”

For once in his life he had a point.  I took my shirt off and jumped in before he could say: “Enjoy it while it lasts.”

Captain Ron served lunch: shrimp cocktail, fruit platter, and cheese and crackers.  My kids devoured the food like dogs and quickly returned to the water to escape my brother-in-law and his girlfriend.

My brother-in-law—let’s call him “Lighthouse,” a nickname he earned in college because of his height, pale white skin, and fear of the sun—was badly sunburned in the Galapagos Islands as a child and spends his free time covering his body with globs of SPF 70 sunscreen in all climates.  The practice becomes more extreme the closer he gets to the equator.  And the madness is contagious; his perfectly “normal” girlfriend—let’s call her “The Girlfriend” because she has taken a leave of absence—inherited his illogical fear of sunlight.  Both wore large-brimmed hats designed for African safaris and clothing intended for fishing guides.

The 30-minute voyage to Peanut Island was fantastic. When I wasn’t enjoying the scenery—to the east, waterfront estates hidden behind walls of greenery and privacy hedges, and to the west, high-rise condos and industrial Riviera Beach—I witnessed the happy couple force sunscreen onto the bodies of my offspring.   Annoyed, the three looked at me for help, but I considered the benefits: a return to shore without sunburns.

The après-lunch activity took the prize. Lighthouse and The Girlfriend reapplied sunscreen to the children and then all five dove into the water.  Rings of the sunscreen’s potentially harmful synthetic ingredients—oxybenzone and octinoxate—appeared on the surface of the water.  The swimmers emerged from the plunge and bubbles fizzled away the messy slick.

Captain Ron and I tossed them snorkeling equipment.  Each swimmer struggled putting on his or her mask; excessive sunscreen application did not help matters.  Fortunately, Cliché did not have enough flippers onboard, which limited the struggle to masks and snorkels.

After Lighthouse had his mask and snorkel ready, he asked me to throw him the plastic bag full of sunscreen.

“You should consider living in Norway,” I said.

“Come on, just throw me the bag.”

“But we have a couple-hundred yard swim?  And it only takes ten minutes to circumnavigate the island?”

“I told him I would carry it,” said The Girlfriend.

I threw her the bag and instructed my children not to go near either one of them as the couple attempted to swim towards the artificial reef near the shoreline.  Lighthouse performed an Olympic-paced, disturbing version of the Australian crawl, leaving The Girlfriend behind to flail in his troubled wake.  The sun shirts they wore on their backs appeared to pull them under.

“You can’t make this stuff up, can you?”  I asked the captain.

Concerned, he said, “Can she swim?   And what is he doing?”

“No,” I replied.  “And he is damaging the water.”

“There won’t be any fish left if he keeps that up.”

“At least the bag of sunscreen floats,” I said, before hopping in with my apparatus.

Underwater, the six of us were overcome by the hues of transformative, striped reef fish.  I recognized a few: the sergeant major, with its yellow sheen, silvery gray, and oftentimes darker shades of blue; the flat, disk-like angelfish with colorations that boggle minds; and the Atlantic porkfish, with its solid yellow forehead and two black vertical bars.

I read the shallow, rocky Peanut Island coastline has some of the best snorkeling in South Florida.  The water, as advertised, was waist-deep, and we played among the lime-rock boulders near the southern edge of the island.

We mainly encountered smaller, schooling reef fish, but I had read and was certain that barracuda, sharks, tarpon, and green moray eels often made an appearance in these waters.  I intermittently studied the fish and watched the kids marvel at the welcome assault on their senses.  When I wasn’t absorbing the marine life, I studied my children’s scuba masks, which were half-full of water.

We practiced clearing the masks, both underwater and above water, but the basics of snorkeling were too difficult to teach that afternoon.  My kids did not understand the dynamics of the shaped tube; typically it should remain above sea level.  Nevertheless, they breathed through their contraptions, partially drowning, always wanting to get closer to fish.

After an hour or so, we swam to the beach and walked around the island.  Lighthouse noticed my shoulders were red.  He offered sunscreen but I refused on principle.  I enjoyed the burn.

We walked past families picnicking under the shade of palm trees.  Kayakers beached their crafts and ate their lunches on the sand.  A man cast his fly rod; the clouser minnow sailed through the air as his children flew kites from atop a hill.  We passed JFK’s bunker and the museum and came full circle to the artificial reef.

Captain Ron waved and it was time to go.  The yacht looked very far away.

Clouds moved in and blocked the sun.  Lighthouse and The Girlfriend reapplied sunscreen.   I ventured into the water first and raced to the channel, testing the current, looking for careless boaters, and searching for sharks beneath the sea.  In the absence of sunlight, the visibility we previously enjoyed had deteriorated.

Halfway to the boat, at an uncertain depth in 20 feet of water, I turned and watched as three dark forms swam towards me.  Rays of sunshine suddenly broke through the clouds, penetrating the water.  The light illuminated the creatures with stripes and brilliant colors my eyes could no longer recognize.

Share on Facebook
Facebook
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter
Email this to someone
email

Filed Under: Travel Journal

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Page 2

Primary Sidebar

Featured Articles

  • COVER STORY: The Gift Hunter’s Guide – Irresistible gifts that celebrate a Keswickian’s unshakeable spirit
  • TRAVEL: Argentina Recollections
  • ENTERTAINING: Leek Bread Pudding – Sam’s Go To Brunch
  • LOOKING BACK: Holiday Decorating
  • WHAT’S COOKING: 3 Cheese Roasted Tomato Crostini

Copyright © 2025 · Keswick Life · Website designed by Moriah Smith